CoderPad is a popular tool for conducting live coding interviews, but it’s not the only option available in 2025. Whether you’re looking for better collaboration tools, deeper analytics, or more comprehensive candidate evaluation, there are several technical assessment platforms that offer strong alternatives.
This blog explores the top 10 online programming test platforms that can replace or complement CoderPad for smoother, smarter, and more scalable coding interviews.
1. CodeSignal
Website: codesignal.com
CodeSignal is a leading technical assessment platform that supports both pre-screening and real-time interviews. It includes a collaborative IDE, AI-backed benchmarking, and integrity monitoring tools that go beyond CoderPad’s core offerings.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Live interview features with global candidate benchmarking and scalable assessments.
2. HackerRank
Website: hackerrank.com
Known for its versatility, HackerRank combines take-home challenges with live pair-programming sessions. Its interface is highly customizable, making it a preferred option among enterprise recruiters.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Wide support for languages, real-time evaluation, and deep analytics.
3. Codility
Website: codility.com
Codility is built to assess programming skills under real-world conditions. Its live coding sessions include problem playback, whiteboarding, and code execution in multiple languages.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Advanced cheating prevention and strong playback capabilities for post-interview review.
4. Evalgator
Website: evalgator.com
Evalgator offers live coding interviews, structured assessments, and the ability to combine coding with aptitude and psychometric tests. It’s a lightweight, fast, and customizable online coding assessment tool.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Flexible and cost-effective platform with live interviews and multi-skill evaluation.
5. Coderbyte
Website: coderbyte.com
Coderbyte combines real-time interviews with an extensive library of coding problems. It also allows candidates to work in their own IDE and submit solutions.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Support for async challenges and technical interviews on the same platform.
6. DevSkiller
Website: devskiller.com
DevSkiller stands out with its RealLifeTesting™ methodology, which simulates real-world development environments and project-based tasks.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Ideal for hiring developers who need to be assessed on full projects, not just algorithmic challenges.
7. Mettl (by Mercer)
Website: mettl.com
Mettl provides a feature-rich experience with its proctoring system, question libraries, and support for real-time collaborative interviews.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Strong in compliance, candidate integrity, and customizable test formats.
8. TestGorilla
Website: testgorilla.com
While not interview-focused, TestGorilla supports asynchronous coding evaluations and integrates video responses. It’s an excellent screening tool before interviews.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Easy to use, scalable, and great for bulk hiring with custom workflows.
9. Adaface
Website: adaface.com
Adaface offers conversational assessments through chat-based interfaces. It also includes live technical interview capabilities.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Friendly UI with adaptive questioning and natural conversation flow.
10. Interviewing.io
Website: interviewing.io
This platform allows anonymous interviews with engineers and includes voice, video, and whiteboard support. It’s especially useful for reducing interviewer bias.
Why it’s a great alternative:
Anonymous candidate screening and an emphasis on real interview simulation.
Conclusion
If CoderPad isn’t meeting your expectations, these ten online coding assessment tools provide diverse options for improving candidate experience and interview quality. From AI-assisted platforms like CodeSignal to real-world simulators like DevSkiller, each online programming test platform brings something unique to the table.
Choosing the right technical assessment platform depends on your hiring goals—whether you’re optimizing for interview efficiency, test integrity, or real-world skills validation.
